Preview 1
Audit Score Overview
Weighted scoring for planning, execution, design quality, and evidence integrity with clear confidence notes.
HairAudit is currently in public beta. All audits are free while we refine the Follicle Intelligence™ scoring system. AI scoring is monitored and manually corrected when required. Clinics and doctors participating in beta receive free access and early ranking placement.
Independent forensic review
This is a structured, independent review of hair transplant quality. Every conclusion is tied to visible evidence, scoring criteria, and confidence limits so patients can make high-stakes decisions with clarity.
Premium report format. Redacted sample content. No private patient data.
Evidence Integrity
84% document confidence
Surgical Scorecard
Correction Priority
Independent documentation
Need clarity before corrective surgery or a formal complaint? Use an evidence-first audit.
Inside the report
Preview 1
Weighted scoring for planning, execution, design quality, and evidence integrity with clear confidence notes.
Preview 2
A domain-by-domain radar profile to reveal strengths and quality gaps in one clinical visual.
Preview 3
Annotated scalp, hairline, and donor imagery with density zones, extraction patterns, and risk markers.
Preview 4
Structured conclusions and realistic next-step actions patients can use for follow-up, repair planning, or dispute documentation.
Live sample visuals
Performance domains mapped across design, density, execution, and donor safety.
Weighted bar chart aligned to report scoring categories.
Separates quality concerns from evidence limitations.
Evidence integrity
84%
Conclusion confidence
79%
Prioritization grid for what to address first.
Immediate priority
Donor over-harvest risk and asymmetrical frontal density.
Next stage
Hairline irregularity refinement and zone-specific planning.
Documentation first
Collect standardized images and operative records before any corrective commitments.
Moderate concern
Frontal line demonstrates asymmetry with abrupt angle transitions at temporal zones, reducing natural flow under direct light.
High concern
Central forelock appears relatively preserved, while bilateral frontal thirds show under-density compared with expected graft allocation.
High concern
Posterior donor extraction appears regionally concentrated with visible spacing inconsistency suggestive of over-harvest risk.
My result looks disappointing and I need a professional, independent quality review.
I am concerned the graft count or achieved density does not match what was promised.
I want an objective second opinion before committing to corrective surgery.
I need structured documentation before a repair consult, complaint, or dispute.
Case clarity starts here
Move from uncertainty to structured evidence. Receive a premium independent report you can use for planning, consultations, and documentation.
HairAudit is independent. We do not sell surgery or clinic referrals.